These look alike and are not the same job.
A colleague is promoted. Their own account moves to the new address: same account, new email, everything already on it comes along. That is the Role Changes list above, and there is nothing to migrate.
A standing mailbox changes hands. president@, secretary@ and the like are accounts in their own right, with their own history. When a new person starts using one, nothing ever moved their details onto it, so it goes on describing the previous holder. That is what this tool is for.
It is not only that the name is wrong. Until this was built, president@dttasa.org still carried the previous holder's private email address, their personal mobile, their city and country, their photograph, and, in the private part of the record, their date of birth and their home address.
A departed colleague's home address and date of birth sitting on an account somebody else signs into is a data protection problem first and a cosmetic one second. Clearing it is the more important half of this job.
IT board, Role Changes, the panel headed Move a person's details onto a role mailbox.
Choose the person on the left and the mailbox on the right, then press Show me what would change. Nothing is written by that button. You get a line for every field, showing what is on the mailbox now and what it would become, grouped as identity, contact, location, signature, and what the previous holder left behind.
Everything is ticked to begin with. Untick anything you want left alone, then Apply the ticked changes and confirm. Run the preview again afterwards and it should report nothing left to change.
The account is never written: the sign-in address, the access level, every permission flag, the working pattern, the PIN and the MFA. The panel lists all of them under What this will not touch, and why, so you can see it rather than take it on trust.
This matters: a tool that could grant a permission while claiming to copy a profile would be a privilege tool wearing the wrong label. The working pattern has its own separate act, run by the Secretary General after the settling-in period.
The post is the exception, and it is deliberate rather than accidental. Part 06 explains how it is set and why it is typed rather than copied.
Almost everything moves. Who they are, how to reach them, where they work, their skills, and their service record: joining date, contract, missions, performance, training. All of it belongs to the person and follows them.
The employee number is moved, not copied. It arrives on the new account and is emptied from the old one, in a single write. A number that exists twice is not an identifier, and if the two halves could ever commit separately that is precisely what you would get.
A field the new holder has not filled in is cleared, not left. If their own record carries no phone number, the mailbox ends with no phone number rather than keeping the previous holder's. Leaving it is the exact failure this exists to fix.
The signature is not moved. It is built, not copied. Use Email Signatures on this board afterwards and it is composed fresh from the name and the post now on the mailbox. Copying the old image across would be overwritten by that builder anyway, and would be wrong in the meantime.
Somebody taking a standing mailbox is usually taking a different post, so the post is the one thing on this screen you type rather than copy. The panel shows you what the department and job title are now, next to the boxes that set the new ones. Leave a box as it is and nothing about the post changes.
What is still never written here: the sign-in address, the access level, and every permission flag. They are listed in the panel under What this will not touch, and why.
IT and super admins only, checked on the server against the portal record rather than anything the browser claims. Every run writes a system_audit_log entry naming who ran it, both accounts, which fields were copied, moved and cleared, and the post before and after. The audit records field names only, never the values: a record of somebody's home address being removed must not itself store the address.
